🔮 Part 7: Emerging & Future IoT Technologies – Towards 6G, Ambient IoT, and Quantum-Safe Connectivity
- Eurth Engineering
- Oct 31, 2025
- 5 min read
Over the past six parts of this series, we’ve explored the entire spectrum of IoT communication technologies – from cellular and satellite IoT (NB-IoT, 5G, Starlink) to short-range wireless (BLE, ZigBee, Wi-Fi), LPWAN (LoRa, Sigfox, Mioty), wired/optical systems (Ethernet, KNX, Fiber), and industrial-grade mission-critical protocols (Wireless HART, ISA100, DECT-2020, TETRA).
Now, in this final part, we’ll look ahead to what’s next for IoT connectivity. Technology never stands still, and new approaches are emerging that will reshape IoT for the next decade.
We’ll also bring everything together in a mega-comparison matrix and a decision framework that you can use as a reference guide for choosing the right IoT protocol for any use case.

🌱 Emerging Technologies in IoT Connectivity
1. Ambient IoT & Zero-Power Devices
The GSMA recently introduced the concept of Ambient IoT – ultra-low-cost, battery-free devices that harvest energy from their surroundings (radio waves, light, vibration).
Range: 1–10 m (RF energy harvesting), up to km when piggybacking on cellular networks.
Power: Zero or near-zero.
Data Rate: Bytes of data (identifiers, small telemetry).
Use Cases:
Supply chain (disposable smart tags).
Retail (smart labels, shelf monitoring).
Healthcare (disposable medical sensors).
Why it matters: If every product on a store shelf has a battery-free IoT tag, we move from millions of IoT devices to billions and trillions.
2. iSIM & Nano-IoT Modules
Integrated SIM (iSIM) moves SIM functionality into the chipset itself.
Reduces size, cost, and power.
Simplifies logistics for global IoT deployments.
Use Cases: Ultra-small IoT devices – wearables, health sensors, small trackers.
3. 6G & Terahertz IoT
6G (expected post-2030) will extend beyond 5G’s eMBB/URLLC/mMTC into new domains:
Terahertz frequencies for ultra-high bandwidth.
Integrated sensing and communication – networks that not only transmit but also sense environments.
AI-native radios – using machine learning to dynamically adapt spectrum usage.
Use Cases:
Holographic communication.
Autonomous drone fleets.
Massive environmental sensing.
4. Quantum-Safe IoT
As quantum computing advances, current encryption (RSA, ECC) will be broken. IoT systems will need post-quantum cryptography (PQC).
Techniques: Lattice-based, hash-based, and multivariate cryptography.
Use Cases: Defense IoT, financial IoT, critical infrastructure.
Why it matters: Billions of IoT devices with long lifespans (10–20 years) must remain secure in a post-quantum world.
5. Hybrid Satellite + Terrestrial IoT
New modules are emerging that support NB-IoT/LTE-M + satellite fallback in one chipset.
Use Cases: Agriculture, logistics, and mining where devices move between urban (cellular) and remote (satellite) zones.
Example: Sateliot and Skylo offer “cellular + satellite IoT” seamlessly.
6. AI-Driven Cognitive Radios
Future IoT radios will use AI to dynamically sense spectrum usage and switch frequencies to minimize interference.
Use Cases: Smart factories with dense wireless environments.
Benefit: Higher reliability, self-healing networks.

From zero-power tags to quantum-safe security, the next wave of IoT is being built for trillions of devices.
📊 Mega Comparison Matrix – All IoT Protocols
Below is a consolidated view of all the protocols we’ve covered across Parts 1–6, plus emerging ones:
Category | Technology | Range | Power | Data Rate | Best Use Cases |
Cellular/Satellite | NB-IoT | 1–10 km | Very Low | <250 kbps | Smart meters, utilities |
LTE-M (Cat-M1) | 1–10 km | Low–Med | ~1 Mbps | Logistics, wearables | |
LTE Cat-1/4 | 1–10 km | Medium | 10–150 Mbps | Cameras, kiosks | |
5G NR | 1–10 km | Med–High | 10 Mbps–1 Gbps | Autonomous vehicles, smart factories | |
Satellite IoT | Global | Medium | 1–100 kbps | Remote/offshore IoT | |
Short-Range Wireless | BLE (incl. Coded PHY) | 10–1000 m | Very Low | 125 kbps–2 Mbps | Wearables, healthcare |
ZigBee | 10–100 m | Low | 250 kbps | Smart homes, smart energy | |
Z-Wave | 30–100 m | Low | 100 kbps | Building automation | |
Wi-Fi 4/5/6 | 10–100 m | High | 10 Mbps–Gbps | Cameras, appliances | |
Wi-Fi HaLow | 100 m–1 km | Medium | 100 kbps–10 Mbps | Long-range Wi-Fi IoT | |
UWB | 10–50 m | Med | ~10 Mbps | Indoor positioning | |
NFC/RFID | cm–10 m | Passive–Low | 100 kbps | Access, tagging | |
Thread/Matter | 10–100 m | Low | 250 kbps | Smart homes | |
LPWAN/Sub-GHz | LoRaWAN | 2–15 km | Very Low | 0.3–50 kbps | Smart cities, agriculture |
Sigfox | 3–50 km | Very Low | 100 bps | Logistics, parcels | |
Mioty | 5–15 km | Very Low | 100 bps–50 kbps | Utilities, industrial IoT | |
DASH7 | 1–2 km | Very Low | 100 kbps | Warehousing, logistics | |
Proprietary ISM (310/433 MHz) | 100 m–2 km | Low | 10–100 kbps | Cranes, gates | |
Wired/Optical | Ethernet/PoE | 100 m–km | High | Mbps–Gbps | Cameras, industrial controllers |
KNX | 100 m–1 km | Low | <100 kbps | Smart buildings | |
BACnet | 100 m–1 km | Low | <100 kbps | HVAC, safety | |
DALI | 100 m | Low | 20 kbps | Lighting | |
Modbus/RS-485 | 100 m–1 km | Low | 100 kbps | Industrial sensors | |
CAN Bus | 40 m–1 km | Low | 1–5 Mbps | Automotive, robotics | |
Optical Fiber | 1–50 km | High | Gbps+ | Backhaul, structural monitoring | |
PLC | 100 m–1 km | Medium | 10 kbps–100 Mbps | Smart grid, metering | |
LiFi/FSO | 10 m–10 km | Medium | 100 Mbps–Gbps | Secure indoor IoT | |
Industrial/Mission-Critical | WirelessHART | 100 m (mesh) | Low | 250 kbps | Oil & gas, refineries |
ISA100.11a | 100–500 m | Low | 250 kbps | Pipelines, power plants | |
DECT-2020 NR | 1–5 km | Low | ~1 Mbps | Smart factories | |
TETRA/P25 IoT | 1–20 km | Medium | kbps | Defense, emergency response | |
Emerging | Ambient IoT | 1–10 m | Zero | Bytes | Retail, supply chain |
iSIM IoT | Global | Low | Varies | Tiny IoT devices | |
Hybrid Sat + Cellular | Global | Medium | kbps–Mbps | Remote asset tracking | |
6G IoT | Global | TBD | Tbps | Future IoT (2030+) | |
Quantum-Safe IoT | Global | N/A | N/A | Secure IoT |
🧭 Decision Framework – Choosing the Right Protocol
Here’s a practical way to select the right IoT protocol:
Step 1: Application Type
Static sensors (meters, environment).
Mobile assets (vehicles, wearables).
High-data devices (cameras, AR).
Mission-critical/industrial.
Retail/disposable.
Step 2: Range Required
<100 m: Use BLE, ZigBee, Wi-Fi, UWB, NFC.
1–15 km: Use LoRa, Sigfox, Mioty, LTE-M, NB-IoT.
Nationwide/global: Use Cellular (LTE/5G) or Satellite.
Step 3: Power Constraints
Battery life needed 5–10 years → NB-IoT, LoRa, Mioty, Ambient IoT.
Rechargeable or mains-powered → Wi-Fi, LTE, 5G.
Step 4: Data Needs
Bytes → Sigfox, Ambient IoT, NB-IoT.
Kilobytes → LoRa, Mioty, BLE, ZigBee.
Megabytes → Wi-Fi, LTE-M, LTE Cat-1.
Video → LTE Cat-4, 5G, Fiber.
Step 5: Environment
Harsh/Industrial → Wireless HART, ISA100, DECT-2020.
Building Automation → KNX, BACnet, DALI.
Consumer → BLE, Matter, Wi-Fi.
Remote → Satellite IoT.

IoT protocol choice depends on range, power, data, and environment — no one-size-fits-all.
🏁 Conclusion – IoT’s Hybrid Future
There is no one-size-fits-all protocol in IoT. Instead, we are entering a future where multiple technologies coexist, each optimized for its use case:
BLE, ZigBee, Matter → smart homes and wearables.
LoRa, Mioty, Sigfox → smart cities, utilities, agriculture.
NB-IoT, LTE-M, 5G → nationwide mobility and industrial automation.
Fiber, PLC, KNX → buildings, grids, and high-bandwidth backhaul.
Wireless HART, ISA100, DECT-2020 → mission-critical industries.
Satellite IoT → global and remote connectivity.
Ambient IoT & 6G → the future of trillion-device ecosystems.
The winning IoT strategy isn’t choosing just one technology – it’s building a hybrid, protocol-agnostic architecture that matches the application’s unique needs.










Comments